TYTUŁ
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies 2012 / Tom 5 (6)
2012 / Tom 5 (6)
Wybierz inny 
TYTUŁ ARTYKUŁU
STRONY
CZYNNOŚCI
-
Standards of Entrepreneur Rights in Competition Proceedings : a Matter of Administrative or Criminal Law?s. 9 - 33CZYSTY TEKSTBIBTEX
-
The Nature of Responsibility of an Undertaking in Antitrust Proceedings and the Concept of ‘Criminal Charge’ in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rightss. 35 - 55CZYSTY TEKSTBIBTEX
-
Competence of Common Courts in Poland in Competition Matterss. 57 - 71CZYSTY TEKSTBIBTEX
-
The Scope of Application of the Provisions of the Administrative Procedure Code in Competition Enforcement Proceedingss. 73 - 89CZYSTY TEKSTBIBTEX
-
Can the Right To Be Heard Be Respected without Access to Information about the Proceedings? : Deficiencies of National Competition Procedures. 91 - 110CZYSTY TEKSTBIBTEX
-
The ne bis in idem Principle in Proceedings Related to Anti-Competitive Agreements in EU Competition Laws. 111 - 135CZYSTY TEKSTBIBTEX
-
Exchange of Information and Evidence between Competition Authorities and Entrepreneurs’ Rightss. 137 - 167CZYSTY TEKSTBIBTEX
-
Rights of an Undertaking in Proceedings Regarding Commitment Decisions under Article 9 of Regulation No. 1/2003s. 169 - 192CZYSTY TEKSTBIBTEX
-
Legal Professional Privilege and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination in EU Competition Law after the Lisbon Treaty : Is It Time for a Substantial Change?s. 193 - 214CZYSTY TEKSTBIBTEX
-
Procedural Autonomy of Member States and the EU Rights of Defence in Antitrust Proceedingss. 215 - 234CZYSTY TEKSTBIBTEX
-
EU Courts’ Jurisdiction over and Review of Decisions Imposing Fines in EU Competition Laws. 235 - 259CZYSTY TEKSTBIBTEX
-
Concurrence of wills – a necessary ingredient of an agreement restricting competition : case comment to the judgment of Court of Competition and Consumer Protection of 8 February 2011 : ZST Gamrat S.A. v President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (Ref. No. XVII Ama 16/10)s. 289 - 295CZYSTY TEKSTBIBTEX
-
The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition : Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict? : Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 : Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011)s. 297 - 311CZYSTY TEKSTBIBTEX
-
"Sprawiedliwość proceduralna w postępowaniu przed organem ochrony konkurencji [Procedural fairness in the proceedings before the competition authority]", Maciej Bernatt, Warszawa 2011 : [recenzja]s. 313 - 317CZYSTY TEKSTBIBTEX
